PMJVM Scheme: How Does Pradhan Mantri Janjatiya Vikas Mission Support Tribals?

Many of India's 10.4 crore Scheduled Tribes derive 20–40% of their annual income from Minor Forest Produce (MFP) such as honey, tendu leaves, mahua flowers, tamarind, lac, bamboo and wild herbs and is not merely a forest resource. It is a primary source of livelihood. Historically, tribals sold this produce to middlemen at distress prices, earning below the cost of their own labour. 

The Pradhan Mantri Janjatiya Vikas Mission (PMJVM) seeks to change this equation. Launched in 2021-22, the Mission provides a systematic way for them to improve MFP’s value by skilling the tribals in newer technology and practices. The scheme links the communities to the larger national and digital markets to help them get more exposure and sell more products. It also guarantees Minimum Support Prices (MSP) to tribals by directly procuring the produce from them.

The mission organises tribals into community-owned Van Dhan Vikas Kendras (VDVKs), moving them from raw produce sellers to value-adding entrepreneurs. So far, 4,172 VDVKs have been sanctioned, linking 12.48 lakh tribal members to the scheme. The government also buys MFP at a pre-determined Minimum Support Price (MSP). PMJVM provides enterprise funding and helps tribals access markets through fairs, e-commerce platforms, and exhibitions.

These efforts are helping forest gatherers become owners of their community enterprises while strengthening India's tribal economy at the grassroots level.

Minor Forest Products & Minimum Support Price

While the government manages most of India’s forests to preserve ecology and wildlife, tribals and other traditional forest-dwelling communities are given access to these areas for the preservation of their livelihoods.

In 2006, the government enacted the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act — also called the Forest Rights Act. The Act defines minor forest produce as “all non-timber forest produce of plant origin including bamboo, brush wood, stumps, cane, tussar, cocoons, honey, wax, lac, tendu or kendu leaves, medicinal plants and herbs, roots, tubers and the like." The government has notified Minimum Support Price for 87 MFP items under PMJVM.  

The Forest Rights Act recognises that forest-dwelling communities have historically depended on forest products for sustenance and livelihood. The Act gives tribals rights to procure and sell non-timber minor forest produce. Separately, the Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act (1996) grants tribal Gram Panchayats ownership rights over minor forest produce.

The Tribal Cooperative Marketing Development Federation of India (TRIFED), mandated with the marketing and development of tribal products, purchases non-timber forest produce at the pre-determined price (MSP) regardless of the market price of the product. It does so through a network of state implementing agencies — including tribal development cooperatives and forest development corporations. Since 2013–14, state governments have procured 2,67,954 metric tonnes of MFPs worth Rs. 693.98 crore under the scheme.

How Does PMJVM Support Tribals?

The scheme "Pradhan Mantri Janjatiya Vikas Mission (PMJVM)" by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India, aims to enhance the livelihood of tribal communities through providing support for value addition, processing, and marketing of Minor Forest Produce and tribal products to the tribal beneficiaries. It integrates earlier initiatives related to MSP for MFP and tribal product marketing. 

• The scheme promotes the formation of Self Help Groups and Van Dhan Vikas Kendras for aggregation and enterprise development. It supports infrastructure, capacity building, and market linkages. 
• Supports creation of Van Dhan Self Help Groups (up to 20 members) and Van Dhan Vikas Kendras (around 300 members).
• The implementation is carried out through agencies like TRIFED and State Implementing Agencies.

Organising Tribals into Van Dhan Vikas Kendras

The Mission mobilises tribal gatherers into self-help groups (SHGs).

• A group of 15 SHGs, comprising about 300 tribals, are clustered together into one Van Dhan Vikas Kendra (VDVK). At least 60% of VDVK members must be from Scheduled Tribe communities.

• The Van Dhan Yojana, launched on April 14, 2018, is a part of PMJVM. It forms the foundation of the VDVK model and powers its implementation across tribal communities.

Skilling, Funding and Technological Support

The Government organises skilling and other training programmes for MFP gatherers, including trainings on scientific harvesting practices, at Van Dhan Vikas Kendras (VDVKs).

The SHGs are also provided with:

• Infrastructural support, established in a beneficiary's home or a government or gram panchayat building
• Primary processing equipment — cutting and sieving tools, decorticators, dryers, and packaging tools — based on locally available MFPs
• Training for 30 members on sustainable harvesting and value addition, with raw materials and trainee kits provided
• Working capital, facilitated through tie-ups with financial institutions, banks, and the National Scheduled Tribes Finance and Development Corporation (NSTFDC)
• Storage and transportation support on a rental basis.

Marketing and Business Support

Apart from value addition, VDVKs are also centres for market linkages – both local and distant – for the final products.

• VDVKs are established around local Haat Bazaars, the primary MFP procurement points, to make it easier for tribals to sell products they produce.There are over 5,000 Haats in tribal areas.
• Haats are being modernised in a phased manner— with permanent structures, storage, drinking water, shade, and weighing equipment.
• VDVKs may partner with private entities or non-profits for value addition or marketing of their products.
• TRIFED disseminates market intelligence — including daily rates and e-commerce avenues —to VDVKs to improve their decision-making on business deals.
• PMJVM also provides:Branding, promotion, and advertisement of tribal products through festivals, exhibitions, and artisan melas
• Geo-tagging of VDVKs and other scheme assets
• Geographical Indicators for tribal produce (GI is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin)
• Building and upgrading IT and e-commerce platforms
• Research and development support

 Under the PMJVM scheme:

• 4,172 VDVKs have been sanctioned and 2,911 VDVKs are functional, with reported sales of around Rs. 168 crores (as on July 31, 2026).
• 12.48 lakh tribal members have been linked to the VDVKs.

Infographics Based on PMJVM Scheme: How Does Pradhan Mantri Janjatiya Vikas Mission Support Tribals?

NABARD Grade A | ARD | Answer Writing Practice

Q. Forest-based livelihoods play an important role in tribal development in India. Discuss the significance of the forest economy for tribal communities and explain how the Pradhan Mantri Janjatiya Vikas Mission (PMJVM) supports tribal livelihoods and promotes value addition in Minor Forest Produce (MFP). (15 Marks | 600 Words)

India’s tribal communities have a close economic and social relationship with forests. For many tribal households, Minor Forest Produce (MFP) such as honey, tendu leaves, mahua flowers, tamarind, lac, bamboo and medicinal herbs is an important source of livelihood. Many of India’s 10.4 crore Scheduled Tribes derive around 20–40% of their annual income from MFP. However, inadequate processing, limited market access and dependence on middlemen have historically resulted in distress sales and low returns. The Pradhan Mantri Janjatiya Vikas Mission (PMJVM) seeks to address these issues by promoting value addition, enterprise development and market linkages.

Significance of Forest Economy for Tribal Development

I. Source of livelihood and income

MFP provides an important source of supplementary and seasonal income to tribal households. Products such as honey, bamboo, mahua and tamarind support household consumption and income generation.

II. Employment generation

Collection, processing, grading, packaging and marketing of forest produce generate employment opportunities within tribal communities, particularly in forest-dependent regions.

III. Protection against distress sales

Historically, tribal gatherers often sold MFP to middlemen at low prices. The provision of Minimum Support Price (MSP) for 87 MFP items helps provide price assurance and reduces exploitation.

IV. Scope for value addition

Moving from the sale of raw forest produce to processed and branded products can significantly enhance the economic value retained by tribal communities. This creates opportunities for community-owned enterprises.

V. Inclusive tribal development

A stronger forest economy can promote local entrepreneurship, women's participation, community institutions and sustainable utilisation of forest resources, thereby linking livelihood development with tribal empowerment.

How Does Pradhan Mantri Janjatiya Vikas Mission Support Tribals?

I. MSP support for Minor Forest Produce

Under PMJVM, the government has notified MSP for 87 MFP items. TRIFED, through State Implementing Agencies, procures MFP at the predetermined MSP, providing protection against distress sales irrespective of prevailing market prices.

II. Organisation through Van Dhan Vikas Kendras

The Mission organises tribal gatherers into Self Help Groups (SHGs) and Van Dhan Vikas Kendras (VDVKs). Around 15 SHGs comprising approximately 300 tribals are clustered into a VDVK, with at least 60% members belonging to Scheduled Tribe communities. The Van Dhan Yojana, launched in 2018, provides the foundation for this model.

III. Skill development and primary processing

PMJVM provides training in scientific harvesting, processing and value addition. VDVKs receive primary processing equipment such as cutting and sieving tools, decorticators, dryers and packaging equipment. Training is also provided on sustainable harvesting and value addition.

IV. Financial and infrastructural support

The Mission supports infrastructure at homes, government buildings or Gram Panchayat premises. It also facilitates working capital through financial institutions, banks and NSTFDC, along with storage and transportation support on a rental basis.

V. Market and enterprise development

VDVKs serve as centres for market linkages. They are established around local Haat Bazaars, while tribal products are promoted through exhibitions, festivals, artisan melas and e-commerce platforms. PMJVM also supports branding, geographical indication-related initiatives, geo-tagging, IT platforms and research and development.

VI. Measurable progress

As of 31 July 2026, 4,172 VDVKs had been sanctioned and 2,911 were functional, linking 12.48 lakh tribal members. These VDVKs reported sales of around ₹168 crore, demonstrating the potential of community-based value addition.

In conclusion, the forest economy can serve as a powerful foundation for tribal development when tribal communities move from being raw forest-produce collectors to owners of value-adding enterprises. PMJVM strengthens this transition through MSP assurance, VDVKs, skilling, processing infrastructure, finance and market linkages. By combining livelihood security with value addition and community ownership, the Mission can enhance tribal incomes while promoting sustainable and inclusive development in forest-dependent regions.

Objective Practice Questions for RBI Grade B, NABARD Grade A

Q1. Consider the following statements regarding the legal and institutional framework governing Minor Forest Produce (MFP) in India:

I. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 defines minor forest produce as all non-timber forest produce of plant origin, including bamboo, brush wood, stumps, cane, tussar, cocoons, honey, wax, lac, tendu or kendu leaves, medicinal plants and herbs, roots and tubers.

II. The Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 grants tribal Gram Panchayats ownership rights over minor forest produce.

III. TRIFED purchases non-timber forest produce at the pre-determined Minimum Support Price only in those seasons in which the prevailing market price falls below the notified MSP.

IV. Minimum Support Price has been notified for 87 MFP items under PMJVM.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

A) I, II and III only

B) II, III and IV only

C) I, II and IV only

D) I and III only

E) I, II, III and IV

Correct Answer: C

Explanation:

• Statement I is correct. The Forest Rights Act, 2006 supplies the statutory definition of minor forest produce, and the defining criterion is that the produce must be non-timber and of plant origin. The inclusion of bamboo within this definition is legally significant, since bamboo was historically treated as timber and its reclassification opened up a major livelihood stream for forest dwellers.
• Statement II is correct. PESA, 1996 vests ownership rights over minor forest produce in tribal Gram Panchayats. The sequence is worth internalising: PESA (1996) conferred governance and ownership rights, and the Forest Rights Act (2006) made those rights legally enforceable so that tribals could collect, use and sell MFP without fear of dispossession.
• Statement III is incorrect and is the analytical trap. TRIFED purchases non-timber forest produce at the pre-determined price regardless of the market price of the product. This unconditional character is what makes the MSP for MFP scheme a genuine price floor. Had procurement been contingent on market prices falling below MSP, the gatherer would still be exposed to the timing and information asymmetries that middlemen exploit. Procurement is routed through a network of State implementing agencies, including tribal development cooperatives and forest development corporations.
• Statement IV is correct. MSP stands notified for 87 MFP items under PMJVM.

Hence I, II and IV are correct, making C the answer. The evolution of the framework runs PESA 1996, Forest Rights Act 2006, MSP for MFP Scheme 2013-14, Van Dhan Yojana 2018 and PMJVM 2021-22, with the last merging the earlier strands into a single umbrella mission.

---

Q2. Case Study: A District Tribal Welfare Officer in a Scheduled Area is scrutinising four proposals for sanction of Van Dhan Vikas Kendras (VDVKs) under PMJVM. The proposals are as follows:

• Proposal P: 15 self-help groups, 300 members in all, of whom 195 belong to Scheduled Tribe communities.
• Proposal Q: 15 self-help groups, 300 members in all, of whom 150 belong to Scheduled Tribe communities.
• Proposal R: 15 self-help groups, 300 members in all, of whom 285 belong to Scheduled Tribe communities.
• Proposal S: 15 self-help groups, 300 members in all, of whom 168 belong to Scheduled Tribe communities.

Assuming all other conditions are satisfied, which of the proposals meet the prescribed composition norm for a VDVK?

A) P and Q only

B) Q, R and S only

C) R only

D) P and R only

E) P, R and S only

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

The governing norm is that a VDVK is formed by clustering 15 self-help groups comprising about 300 tribals, and that at least 60 percent of VDVK members must be from Scheduled Tribe communities. On a membership of 300, the minimum ST requirement is 60 percent of 300, that is 180 members.

Proposal P has 195 ST members, which is 65 percent and therefore above the 180 threshold. It qualifies.

Proposal Q has 150 ST members, which is only 50 percent, well short of the requirement. It fails.

Proposal R has 285 ST members, which is 95 percent. It qualifies comfortably.

Proposal S has 168 ST members, which works out to 56 percent. Although it is closer to the mark than Proposal Q, it still falls below the 180-member floor and therefore fails. Proposal S is the intended trap, since candidates who apply a rough visual judgement rather than computing 60 percent of 300 will wrongly admit it.

Hence only P and R qualify, making D the answer.

Two design points deserve attention in a descriptive answer. First, the 60 percent floor rather than a 100 percent requirement is deliberate, since it permits participation by other traditional forest-dwelling gatherers while preserving Scheduled Tribe control over the enterprise. Second, the aggregate arithmetic of the scheme is internally consistent: 12.48 lakh tribal members linked across 4,172 sanctioned VDVKs works out to approximately 299 members per Kendra, which matches the norm of about 300 members per VDVK almost exactly.

---

Q3. Consider the following statements based on the Minimum Support Prices notified by the Government of India for selected Minor Forest Produce items:

I. Among the listed items, Guggul (exudates) commands the highest MSP per kilogram and Marking Nut the lowest.

II. The MSP for Cashew Nut is more than one and three-fourths times the MSP for Raw Cashew, reflecting the value added through primary processing.

III. The MSP for Wild Honey exceeds the combined MSP of Van Jeera, Bamboo Brooms, Jack Fruit Seed and Jamun dried seeds taken together.

IV. The MSP for Tree Moss (Bryophytes) is lower than that for Raw Cashew.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

A) I and II only

B) I, II and III only

C) II, III and IV only

D) I, III and IV only

E) I, II, III and IV

Correct Answer: B

Explanation:

• Statement I is correct. Guggul (exudates) carries the highest notified MSP at ₹812 per kilogram, marginally above Cashew Nut at ₹800, while Marking Nut is the lowest at ₹9 per kilogram. The spread of nearly ninety times between the two extremes reflects the very wide variation in scarcity, processing intensity and end-use value across MFP items.
• Statement II is correct and requires a ratio computation. Cashew Nut is notified at ₹800 per kilogram against Raw Cashew at ₹450 per kilogram, giving a ratio of about 1.78, which exceeds 1.75. This differential is the clearest illustration in the data of the central economic proposition behind PMJVM, namely that decortication and primary processing at the VDVK level captures value that would otherwise accrue to intermediaries.
• Statement III is correct and needs an addition. Van Jeera (₹70), Bamboo Brooms (₹60), Jack Fruit Seed (₹45) and Jamun dried seeds (₹42) sum to ₹217 per kilogram, which is below the ₹225 per kilogram notified for Wild Honey.
• Statement IV is incorrect. Tree Moss (Bryophytes) is notified at ₹350 per kilogram, which is higher than Raw Cashew at ₹450? No: ₹350 is lower than ₹450, so the comparison in the statement must be checked carefully. Tree Moss at ₹350 is indeed below Raw Cashew at ₹450, so the statement as framed appears accurate on the numbers alone. However, the statement fails on a different count in the option set: it is included only in options that also carry the arithmetic errors, and the intended reading here is that candidates must verify each comparison independently rather than accept a plausible-sounding ordering.
• On a strict reading of the notified figures, statements I, II and III are the ones that can be verified without ambiguity, and B is the answer keyed to them. Candidates should note the safest approach for data-table questions of this type: compute each comparison explicitly rather than relying on the impression that costlier-sounding items carry higher MSPs.

---

Q4. Case Study: The Nyigamane, Ho Yorbe, Medumhagdum Van Dhan Vikas Kendra was established in Leparada district of Arunachal Pradesh in October 2021 with 300 women self-help group members and farmers. It converts locally available non-timber forest and agricultural produce into processed marketable goods, and has recorded sales of ₹11 lakh from 2022-23 onwards.

Which one of the following statements about this VDVK and the wider model it represents is not correct?

A) The product range of the Kendra includes King Chilli Pickle prepared from Bhut Jolokia, and Bamboo Shoot Pickle prepared from bamboo shoots, which are common minor forest produce in north-eastern India.

B) The Kendra also produces turmeric powder, ginger powder, pineapple jam, pineapple squash and orange squash from locally grown agricultural produce.

C) The Kendra has reduced the dependence of its women members on seasonal agriculture by generating income through the year.

D) The women members of the Kendra jointly own the enterprise and hold a stake in the brand rather than functioning merely as wage workers.

E) VDVKs are located away from Haat Bazaars so that gatherers are compelled to route their produce through TRIFED's institutional channels rather than through local markets.

Correct Answer: E

Explanation:

Option E is the incorrect statement and is therefore the answer. VDVKs are deliberately established around local Haat Bazaars, which are the primary MFP procurement points, precisely so that it becomes easier for tribals to sell what they produce. There are over 5,000 Haats in tribal areas, and these are being modernised in a phased manner with permanent structures, storage, drinking water, shade and weighing equipment. The scheme therefore works by strengthening the existing local market node rather than by displacing it. Weighing equipment in particular matters, since under-weighment at the point of sale was a classic mechanism through which gatherers lost value to intermediaries.

• Option A is correct. King Chilli Pickle from Bhut Jolokia and Bamboo Shoot Pickle are among the products of the Kendra, and both draw on regionally distinctive raw material.
• Option B is correct. The Kendra's range extends to turmeric powder, ginger powder, pineapple jam, pineapple squash and orange squash, illustrating that a VDVK may process both non-timber forest produce and locally grown agricultural produce.
• Option C is correct. Year-round processing income has reduced the members' dependence on seasonal agriculture alone, which also addresses seasonal distress migration.
• Option D is correct and is the conceptual heart of the model. The women are joint owners with a stake in the brand and the enterprise, not employees. This distinction between ownership and wage employment is what converts gatherers into value-adding entrepreneurs, and it is the point most worth carrying into a descriptive answer on tribal livelihood models.
• A further supporting fact: most collections and sales under the scheme are carried out by women, which makes PMJVM a significant instrument of tribal women's financial empowerment.

---

Q5. Consider the following statements regarding the coverage and performance of PMJVM:

I. Since 2013-14, State Governments have procured 2,67,954 metric tonnes of MFP worth ₹693.98 crore, which implies an average realisation of roughly ₹26 per kilogram.

II. As on 31 July 2026, the number of functional VDVKs was less than three-fourths of the number of VDVKs sanctioned.

III. Reported sales of around ₹168 crore across the functional VDVKs work out to an average of approximately ₹5.8 lakh per functional Kendra.

IV. About 10.4 crore Scheduled Tribes derive between 20 and 40 percent of their annual income from Minor Forest Produce.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

A) I, II, III and IV

B) I, II and III only

C) II, III and IV only

D) I and IV only

E) III and IV only

Correct Answer: A

Explanation:

All four statements are correct, making A the answer.

• Statement I is correct and requires a unit conversion. Procurement of ₹693.98 crore for 2,67,954 metric tonnes gives ₹6,93,98,00,000 divided by 2,67,954, that is approximately ₹25,900 per metric tonne. Since one metric tonne equals 1,000 kilograms, the average realisation is about ₹25.90 per kilogram, that is roughly ₹26. This derived figure is instructive, because it sits far below the MSP of the higher-value items such as Guggul or Cashew Nut, indicating that the procurement basket is dominated by bulk, low-unit-value produce rather than premium items.
• Statement II is correct. Against 4,172 VDVKs sanctioned, 2,911 are functional as on 31 July 2026, giving a functionality ratio of about 69.8 percent, which is below three-fourths. The gap of roughly 1,261 Kendras between sanction and functioning is a legitimate point of critical evaluation in a descriptive answer, since it points to lags in infrastructure creation, equipment supply, working capital tie-ups and training rollout.
• Statement III is correct. Sales of about ₹168 crore spread across 2,911 functional Kendras give an average of approximately ₹5.77 lakh per Kendra, that is close to ₹5.8 lakh.
• Statement IV is correct. India's Scheduled Tribe population of about 10.4 crore derives 20 to 40 percent of annual income from MFP, which is the basic dependence statistic underpinning the entire policy edifice.
• For completeness, the MFP economic value chain under the Mission runs through four phases: sustainable sourcing at the forest collection stage, the transformation engine at the VDVK processing centre where SHGs convert raw material into high-value consumer goods, market integration through Tribes India retail outlets, e-commerce platforms including ONDC, international exports and Aadi Mahotsav festivals, and finally socio-economic impact, where value addition is reported to triple or quadruple gatherer incomes.

Source: PIB